Diversity

Here’s when you need to reevaluate DEI programming

by

DEI Programming: Time for a Tune-Up?

In today’s rapidly evolving landscape, organizations must continually assess the effectiveness of their DEI initiatives. Here are some telltale signs that it’s time for a programming reevaluation:

Lack of Progress: Metrics show minimal improvements or even stagnation.
 Employee Feedback: Staff express dissatisfaction or a sense of disconnect.
Changing Demographics: The workforce has undergone significant shifts, necessitating tailored approaches.
 Executive Mandate: Leadership recognizes the need for a refresh or realignment.
* Legal or Ethical Implications: Emerging laws or best practices highlight the necessity for updates.

At a Time When Students Feel Alone, Affinity Groups Connect Us All

by

At a time when students may feel isolated and alone, affinity groups like the ones at Follett Higher Education Group foster a sense of belonging and connection. These groups provide a safe and inclusive space for students to connect with others who share common experiences, backgrounds, and interests. Whether it’s through cultural clubs, student organizations, or academic societies, affinity groups create a sense of community within the larger university environment. By offering support, encouragement, and networking opportunities, these groups play a vital role in enhancing students’ overall well-being and success.

Trump Signs Executive Order Ending DEI Programs Including Affirmative Action

by

In a bold move that has sparked widespread debate, President Trump has signed an executive order prohibiting federal agencies from implementing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, including affirmative action initiatives. This decision has sent shockwaves through the education, employment, and civil rights communities.

The order argues that DEI programs foster division and undermine meritocratic principles. Supporters of the decision applaud it as a step towards equal opportunity, while opponents fear it will exacerbate existing inequalities. The long-term implications of this move remain uncertain, but it is certain to shape the discourse on social justice and equity for years to come.